SINCE 1759

Free alert to Candide's Notebooks
Your email:


Bush's Churchill fetish doesn't stop with that little bust of the man he likes to show off in the Oval Office . Thanks to Bad Attitudes.


Daily Bloggerback
Best of Blogs Round-Up: Tuesday, April 4, 2006

Quote of the day: "If I’m ever kidnapped, I guess I should expect no mercy from either my kidnappers — or my fellow Americans.”—Chris Allbriton, Back to Iraq


Featured Blog, I: A Mouthful of Bad Law
Judge Posner, Hamdi and Korematsu

On Thursday, Judge Posner led a work-in-progress Workshop on his forthcoming book, Not a Suicide Pact, which examines the inevitable trade-offs between security and liberty in times of national emergency. As always, Judge Posner made many provocative points. One struck me in particular, however. Judge Posner commended the Court's 2004 decision in Hamdi, in which the Court held that the government could not indefinitely detain an American citizen captured in Afghanistan, without giving him some sort of hearing in which he could contest the claim that he was an "enemy combatant." The details of such a heard were unspecified, but Judge Posner agreed that the Court was correct to insist on a fair hearing as a condition of extended detention. After all, why should we detain someone who is not an enemy combatant?

On other occasions, however, Judge Posner has defended FDR's decision in February 1942 to detain more than 110,000 individuals of Japanese descent, two thirds-of whom were American citizens, and lock them away in concentration camps -- men, women, and children -- for the better part of three years. None of these individuals was given a hearing. I wondered whether Judge Posner could reconcile his approval of both Hamdi and Korematsu. Hamdi involved the detention of an American citizen caught in a war zone in Afhanistan, and the Court held he had a right to a hearing to determine whether he was in fact an enemy combatat. But 80,000 Japanese-Americans, living peacefully on the west coast, were locked away in concentrations camps with no showing whatever that any of them had ever done or planned to do anything wrong. I pointed out to Judge Posner that the only hearing the Japanese-American were entitled to was on the question whether they were Japanese-American. Shouldn't they have had at least the same right as Hamdi to a hearing before a neutral and detached decisionmaker to decide if they posed a threat to the nation? If Hamdi is right, as Judge Posner concedes, then how can any less than a Hamdi-like hearing be granted to the Japanese-Americans who were interned in World War II? On the other hand, if Korematsu was correct, then surely Hamdi was wrong. A Muslim-American citizen picked up on the battlefield in Ahghanistan could be assumed to be dangerous to the U.S. with the same certitude that a Japanese-American living in Spokane could be assumed to be dangerous to the nation.

Complicating the picture even further was the willingness of the U.S. authorities in World War II to give due process hearings to every German and Italian national seized by the government, the vast majority of whom were released after their hearing. How can it be that we gave such a hearing to Hamdi, and to every German and Italian national in 1941-1943, but not to a single person of Japanese descent -- including 80,000 Japanese-Americans. The only plausible answer, the only answer that makes any sense, is that the treatment of the Japanese-Americans was tainted by racism. And, not surprisingly, since World War II, the nation have repeated acknowledged this error. Even President Reagan signed the Civil Liberties Restoration Act, which expressly apologized for this racist decision. This is all seem self-evident -- except to Judge Posner, who continues to cling to the idea that the internment and the decision in Korematsu were right because of the nature of the threat then facing the nation. Come on, Dick, admit it: The Japanese internment was wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.One of the Supreme Court's greatest failures was its spineless decision in Korematsu upholding the executive order on the ground that it wasn't racist! You got it right in Hamdi. Now recognize that the Court was simply wrong in Korematsu!


Featured Blogs, II: Dadaism
Bloggon Dads

[The Journal's blog round-up today explores (in part) daddy blogs. It'd be a shame to keep the findings locked behind a pay wall. Here's the part of the round-up devoted to the salient matter.]

Lots of parents keep blogs, but "daddy" bloggers have carved out their own niche within the blogosphere. "Daddy" blogs gripe about the same ups and downs as mommy blogs, but from a male perspective, so you might find more posts on cool cars as well as restaurants where the men's room has a changing table.

Daddytypes offers content from which all parents (moms included) can benefit, including product reviews, links to articles, and helpful hints (such as where to find sales and coupons for kids' stuff).

Written by Greg Allen, a documentary filmmaker and screenwriter, the site also offers a fair dose of quirky commentary. For example, a recent post delved into critical analysis of the popular Australian children's show "The Wiggles": "Lately, of course, the Wiggles find themselves stretched thin personally, and they're trying to shore up and extend the brand in an attempt to avoid a bleak Rolling Stones-like future of endless geezers-in-turtlenecks world tours."

This blog aims to "put the stay-at-home dad trend under the microscope." Written by Brian Reid, a writer who works largely from his home outside Washington, D.C., Rebel Dad reads less like a personal blog and more like a data source on parenting. Posts discuss articles and flag recent studies on topics ranging from "mommy wars" (working moms versus stay-at-home moms) to the merits of minivan ads. The site also has a useful "statistics" page with links to relevant census data and other reports.

For those looking to connect with other dads, Mr. Reid links to, a networking site for stay-at-home fathers.

Urban hipsters unsure how to adapt to their role as parents can check out Metrodad, where Pierre Kim (who describes himself as a "public policy analyst trapped in the body of an Asian-American fashion executive"), recounts the dilemma of trying to raise a well-adjusted child in New York City while retaining his "hedonistic" lifestyle.

Mr. Kim's often-cheeky posts include insight into his evolving relationship with his toddler daughter, as well as humorous slice-of-life observations. "One of the things I really love about America is the fact that we're not afraid to deep-fry anything," he wrote recently. "I thought I'd tried everything but, on Saturday night, we went to Fix Restaurant [in Las Vegas] and I had deep-fried Macaroni and Cheese. It was amazing!"

Mr. Kim also contributes to dad-themed blogs Rice Daddies ( and dadcentric (

Those seeking ironic relief from the lovey-dovey mush that dominates many parent sites can check out Cynical Dad, which takes a "humorous and cynical look at parenting." Updated regularly, titles of recent posts include: "Because It's Not a Birthday Party Until You're Performing the Heimlich Maneuver" and "My Daughter Wants her Daddy Dead." Cynical Dad links to other sites that take a humorous look at child care, including It's Not All Mary Poppins ( and Grumppopotamus (
Bookmark and Share


Read Pierre’s Latest at

The Latest Comments

Add to Google Reader or Homepage Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe in Rojo   Add to My AOL Subscribe in FeedLounge Add to netvibes Subscribe in Bloglines Add to The Free Dictionary